So that people who were going to die this year anyway don't die?
This virus rarely gives healthy kids problems.
This virus rarely gives healthy teens problems.
This virus rarely gives healthy 20 & 30 somethings problems.
This virus rarely gives the 40 to 60 crowd problems.
This virus IS REALLY HARD on people over 70 who already have a debilitating illness.
What are we ultimately doing and who are we ultimately saving with all of this? I know a person who died from COVID. He was barely hanging on by a thread BEFORE he got it...he could have easily died of the flu or anything else this year. I know a person who is in her 70's who has had cancer before and who has it...she is probably going to be FINE.
Last I heard the VAST majority of people who get this have symptoms so mild that they don't even know they have it.
The last I heard the mortality rate is now about what the flu has been (even with the exaggerated numbers...of calling every death COVID...which this shady practice has been confirmed).
So again...we are shutting the world down for what?
I don't understand why we don't just have a strict quarantine for the elderly and let everyone else develop some herd immunity.
I get your frustration. The past five months have sucked, and there's no light at the end of the tunnel, yet. And if college football is canceled this fall, it will suck a little more.
The number of deaths in the US this year, however, would seem to indicate that COVID is mostly killing people who would not have died this year. Maybe many would have died in two years, or four, or six--I don't know of a way to test that out except to watch over the course of the next few years to see if the number of annual deaths slightly decreases over the next few years. What the numbers do show is that most high populous states have had a significant increase of deaths so far this year compared to deaths in the past decade--which indicates that COVID is killing people who probably would not have died this year.
Then, there is the matter of lingering illness from this. Like many of you, I now know a dozen plus friends who've gotten COVID--all young or middle age and healthy. While most had nothing more than a bad case of the flu, I have two friends that are still struggling two months into this. There are reports that some people may end up with permanent heart or lung issues with this. Can this be confirmed? No, not until we all live years into the future. But shouldn't it be taken into account?
By the time -- in five years or ten -- researchers finally nail down the death rate of COVID-19, it may turn out to be not much worse than the flu. But the big difference is that nobody has ever had this before and no vaccine was available for the vulnerable to take. As Northern Italy, NYC, and more recently Houston and parts of Mississippi found out, when too many people get sick at the same time we do not have the resources--hospital beds, ICU beds, ventilators, etc--to care for everyone.
Quarantining the elderly and vulnerable and keeping things more of the same for everyone else is the strategy Sweden tried. Their death rates per capita I recently saw was worse than ours and their economy wasn't doing any better. Herd immunity, even at the fast pace we are spreading this virus in the US, will take around 18-30 more months at the rate we are going. And we can't go much faster or we get NYC in March or Houston in July.
All that is to say that the decisions Republican and Democratic governors and mayors, liberal and conservative CEO's and college presidents are making is saving tens to hundreds of thousands of lives and the well-being of many more. I think it is worth it. But it still sucks.