Author Topic: BCS: No playoff anytime soon.  (Read 4360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ZackUSAF82

  • Franchise Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 22341
  • Gender: Male
  • Member Since 02/2009
BCS: No playoff anytime soon.
« on: January 04, 2005, 02:58:10 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Quote
    MIAMI -- The Bowl Championship Series will consider using a committee of college football experts to set the next national title game, but there are no plans for a playoff to decide who's truly No. 1.

    "I have to tell you, I really do not see an NFL-style playoff coming to college football any time soon," BCS coordinator and Big 12 commissioner Kevin Weiberg said Tuesday.

    Weiberg also said the BCS will search for a replacement for the Associated Press poll to help rank the top teams.

    Five teams took perfect records into this bowl season, prompting many fans, players and even some coaches to call for a playoff format.

    Auburn and Utah won their bowl games, and Boise State lost for the first time. Southern California and Oklahoma will play for the BCS title Tuesday night in a matchup of unbeatens in the Orange Bowl.

    Weiberg said he is "very interested" in a committee structure that would be similar to the one used to set the field for the NCAA basketball tournaments.

    "I'm not prepared to endorse it because I want to hear more about the discussion with my colleagues," he said.

    "I think we certainly need to take a look and see whether there are alternatives in terms of whether there is another poll that could perhaps be plugged into the spot that was there for the AP poll," he said.

    The men's NCAA basketball tournament uses a 10-person committee made up of conference commissioners and athletic directors to set its field of 65 teams.

    A BCS selection committee likely would need more than 10 members, Weiberg said.

    "I don't believe it would be an easy assignment, and I think my sense is, though, there would be people that would be willing to serve and that care a lot about college football, that have been tied to it in the past, that are part of institutions now that would likely step forward," he said.

    Even if a committee is used to set the 1 vs. 2 game, and possibly even to create a pool of at-large teams for the bowls to choose from, it wouldn't eliminate the need for the BCS standings.

    Weiberg said he didn't envision a committee setting all the matchups.

    "We still are going to have a need in whatever system we have, even with a committee, to have some sort of standings," he said. "So it would be very likely that even in a committee structure, there would have to be some sort of published standings. How often it would occur, I don't know.

    The Associated Press sent the BCS a cease-and-desist letter last month, asking that the AP poll not be used in the BCS formula.

    Last year, the BCS decided to emphasize the AP media poll and the ESPN/USA Today coaches' poll more than ever before. The two polls each counted for one-third of a team's BCS grade in 2004. A compilation of six computer rankings made up the other third.

    The AP said the BCS's unauthorized use of its poll has harmed AP's reputation and interfered with AP's agreements with AP poll voters.

    "I don't believe that the coaches' poll and a combination of computers is sufficient," Weiberg said. "I think something else is going to have to happen there."

    Speaking at the Football Writers Association of America awards breakfast, Weiberg said other issues BCS officials will address this offseason include:

    Future automatic qualification provisions for conferences. The new standard will allow all Division I-A conferences the opportunity to earn an automatic BCS bid.

    The logistics of a fifth BCS game. A fifth game was added last year to allow greater access to the BCS. The new double-hosting model will have the current four BCS games -- Sugar, Orange, Rose and Fiesta bowls -- played about a week before the championship game. The championship game site will continue to rotate between the four major bowls.

    Two television networks. The BCS signed a four-year deal worth $320 million with Fox last month for the broadcast rights to the Fiesta, Orange and Sugar bowls from 2007 to 2010 and the national title game from 2007 to 2009. ABC still owns the rights to the Rose Bowl.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=1958914
    GO HERD!!!
     

    HerdFans.com

    BCS: No playoff anytime soon.
    « on: January 04, 2005, 02:58:10 PM »

    Offline Herdfan92

    • Junior Varsity
    • ***
    • Posts: 549
    Crap, Crap, Crap.
    « Reply #1 on: January 04, 2005, 03:13:31 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • This is the only thing I hate about being I-A.  For some reason, the "big boys" think that going undefeated means that you are the best in the country.  In 1994 Marshall beat two undefeated teams in the playoff (Howard and Troy St.).  

    Each conference champ should get an automatic bid to the playoffs.  Then use the BCS formula to decide the top 24 in the country.  The Top eight get a bye the first week.  It's that simple.  We could be done two weeks before Christmas, if we wanted to.  that means we would still have time for all the worthless bowls.

    I just don't understand how a vast majority of fans support a playoff, but the NCAA refuses to get one!  What is wrong with the world!
     

    Offline Huffnagel

    BCS: No playoff anytime soon.
    « Reply #2 on: January 04, 2005, 10:07:42 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Quote
    "I have to tell you, I really do not see an NFL-style playoff coming to college football any time soon," BCS coordinator and Big 12 commissioner Kevin Weiberg said Tuesday.

    Why not? It has been working finr for years already in College football! Ever hear of 1-AA, I thought that was part of the NCAA! :?
    Quote
    The BCS signed a four-year deal worth $320 million with Fox last month for the broadcast rights to the Fiesta, Orange and Sugar bowls from 2007 to 2010 and the national title game from 2007 to 2009.

    Now why won't the BcS consider changing the current format? Hummm, could it have anything to do with getting $80,000,000 A YEAR FOR JUST SHOWING THE GAMES ON TELEVISION? :evil:

    And that is only 3 of the 4 bowls because the Rose bowl bargains for its' own television contracts!

    I thought the BCS was to put the best teams in the bowls? If this is true then why does any conference have an automatic tie in? Why not the top 8 teams in the BCS get a chance at those Bowls? MONEY! It will never change, at least now we know it won't change at least until after 2010
    It's Great Being a Thundering Herd Football Fan!!!


    Follow Us on Twitter!
    Follow HerdFans on Twitter @HerdFans_

    Follow Us on Facebook!
    Follow HerdFans on Facebook @realHerdFans
     

    Offline FLORIDA HERD FAN

    • Heisman
    • *****
    • Posts: 2466
    BCS: No playoff anytime soon.
    « Reply #3 on: January 06, 2005, 08:35:46 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Why not do both? And, why am I the only one asking this question?

    The BCS encumbers 8 (or perhaps 10) teams. A national championship tournament field is 16 teams. A team invited to both can simply choose. Then, the next seed moves up.

    Any D-IA college president who sincerely feels that his players are incapable of playing 4 more games and keeping up with their academics (ex.: Harvard) can simply keep his team out of the playoffs.

    24 to 26 teams total in the BCS and playoffs leaves enough remaining 'bowl-eligible' D-IA teams to fill 15 to 16 minor bowls.
     

    Offline Herdfan92

    • Junior Varsity
    • ***
    • Posts: 549
    Great idea!!
    « Reply #4 on: January 06, 2005, 05:36:58 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • They already do this in I-AA.  A couple of the historically African American colleges choose to play in the heritage bowl instead of going to the playoffs.  Let's do it in I-A!
     

    HerdFans.com

    Great idea!!
    « Reply #4 on: January 06, 2005, 05:36:58 PM »